Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Neonatal Database
Neonatal Database Download
Neonatal Journal Abstracts
Feedback
Salient Features
Open Access
Editorial Board
Publisher
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Journal Policy
Peer Review Process
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here
Register For Article Submission
Login Here
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJARS
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2013 Month : April Volume : 1 Issue : 1 Page : 2 - 4 Full Version

A Clinical Study of Respiratory Distress In Newborn and its Outcome


Santosh S, Kushal kumar K, Adarsha Eay
1. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, MVJ Medical College, Bangalore, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, MVJ Medical College, Bangalore, India. 3. Professor and Head of Department, Rajrajeshwari Medical College, Bangalore, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Santosh S,
Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics,
MVJ Medical College, Bangalore, India.
Phone: 09886241720
Email: varsha_saniha@yahoo.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Respiratory distress in neonates is one of the important clinical manifestations of a variety of disorders of the respiratory system and non respiratory disorders. It has been estimated that 40-50% of all the perinatal deaths occur following respiratory distress. Aims and Objectives: 1. To estimate the proportion of respiratory distress in the newborn period. 2. To know the etiological factors of respiratory distress. 3. To study the morbidity and mortality of respiratory distress in nicu. Materials and Methods: All newborn babies admitted to kims hospital nicu during a period of 1 year from april 2002 to march 2003 who developed respiratory distress were studied. These admissions comprised of neonates delivered in our hospital (in-borns) as well as those neonates who were refered to our nicu from other hospitals and delivery centers (out-borns). Results: The present study is descriptive in nature where clinical spectrum of respiratory distress in neonates and its outcome were studied. 553 Neonates were admitted in NICU during the study period, among them 76(13.7%) Developed respiratory distress. In the overall study 92.2% Survived with 6 deaths. 4 Deaths were due to preterm with RDS, 1 due to preterm with BA with RDS and 1 due to BA with RDS and sepsis. Most of the deaths were due to RDS (83%). Conclusion: Transient tachypnoea was the main cause of respiratory distress followed by RDS. In most of the cases X-ray findings correlated with the clinical picture. ABG was found normal in most of the cases. RDS was the main cause for ventilation.
Keywords : Respiratory Distress, Nicu, Birth Asphyxia
DOI and Others : Financial OROTHER COM PETING INTERESTS: None. Date of Submission: Feb 19, 2013 Date of Peer Review: Mar 31, 2013 Date of Acceptance: Apr 08, 2013 Date of Publishing: Apr 19, 2013
 
INTRODUCTION

Respiratory distress in neonates is one of the important clinical manifestations of a variety of disorders of the respiratory system and non respiratory disorders. It has been estimated that 40-50% of all the perinatal deaths occur following respiratory distress. Schaffer (1) and Cunningham (2) Prodham (3) found that RDS is the leading cause of respiratory distress followed by massive aspiration and pneumonia. There has been a tremendous advances in the management of respiratory distress such as ventillatory therapy with different modes such as CPAP, conventional mechanical ventilation, ultra high frequency jet ventilation, liquid ventilation, surfactant replacement therapy, sophisticated monitoring and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation all have improved the outcome among the babies with respiratory distress. Inspite of the varying recent advance in clinching diagnosis and management there has been very less clinical studies on the neonatal respiratory distress in our country. Therefore, there is aneed to know the etiological factors and outcome of the babies with respiratory distress. This study has been designed to know the etiology, clinical features, management and outcome of the babies with respiratory distress. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To estimate the proportion of respiratory distress in • the newborn period. To know the etiological factors of respiratory dis• tress. To study the morbidity and mortality of respiratory • distress in NICU.
 
 
Material and Methods

All newborn babies admitted to KIMS Hospital NICU during a period of 1 year from April 2002 to March 2003 who developed respiratory distress were studied. These admissions comprised of neonates delivered in our hospital (in-borns) as well as those neonates who wererefered to our NICU from other hospitals and delivery centers (out-borns). Inclusion criteria Both in-born and out-born neonate admitted to • NICU with respiratory distress. Exclusion criteria Babies more than 28 days.• Babies weight less than 1000 gms.• Babies less than 28 wks of age.• Babies were nursed under servo control open care system. The cases were diagnosed clinically by the presence of atleast 2 of the following criteria, namely RR of 60/min or more, subcostal indrawing, xiphoid retraction, suprasternal indrawing, flaring of alae nasi, expiratory grunt and cyanosis at room temperature. These infants were examined in detail with particular emphasis on gestational age, sex, weight, cyanosis; they were also assessed by scoring systems using Silvermen Anderson scoring system and Downe’s scoring system. Respiratory, Cardiovascular and Nervous system were examined in detail. They were kept under constant supervision till discharge or death and treatment was carried out for the specific indication. Retrospective study of the mother’s significant antenatal history was taken. The diagnosis of clinical conditions producing respiratory distress was based mainly on careful scrutiny of the history, clinical and radiological findings. Continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation was done using pulse oxymeter. ABG analysis was done frequently in unstable babies and with changes in ventilator settings. Blood glucose was monitored regularly using the dextrostix, sepsis work up was done when clinically indicated, endotracheal tube and blood culture sensitivity were ordered if septicaemia or pneumonia was suspected. Oxygen was supplied from an oxygen concentrator, which is a useful equipment to supply oxygen. Ventilator was started in those who required ventilatory support. The settings of the ventilator was varied with the underlying disease and ABG analysis and the aim was to use the minimum possible fractional inspired oxygen concentrator (FiO2) to maintain normal blood gases. All babies were monitored for any complication like air leak, congestive cardiac failure, sepsis, PDA, etc.; chest physiotherapy was given during and after ventilation. Babies were weaned off the ventilator when they showed clinical, radiological improvements and normal blood gases. Dexamethasone (0.2 to 0.4 mg/kg) was given 24 hours prior to expected extubation. The endpoint of the study was hemodynamically stable baby accepting feeds fit to be shifted out of NICU or when baby succumbed to treatment.
 
 
Results

The present study is descriptive in nature where clinical spectrum of respiratory distress in neonates and itsoutcome were studied. 553 neonates were admitted in NICU during the study period, among them 76 (13.7%) developed respiratory distress.
 
 
Discussion

In our study, 30 (39%) babies were term and 46 (61%) were pre term. The study done by Thomas et al., (4) showed 58% of term babies and 42% were preterms developed RD. In Khatua SP et al., study (5) among 182babies with RD 133 (73%) babies were term infants and 49 (29%) were preterms. In our study among 5 cases of PROM, 2 (40%) developed sepsis and pneumonia. In study conducted by Philip et al., (10) 671% of the cases with history of PROM developed pneumonia and sepsis. In our study it was observed that 35 (46%) babies had TTNB, 24 (31.5%) babies had RDS, 19 (25%) had BA, 19(25%) babies had pneumonia and sepsis, 6 (7.8%) babies had MAS, 2 (2.6%) babies had pneumothorax, 1 (1.3%) neonates had CHD, 1 (1.3%) neonates had laryngomalacia as a cause for respiratory distress. According to Tudehope and Smith (6) TTNB is the commenst cause of RD accounting for 41%, he also showed TTNB was more common following caesarean section before labour the reason given that is in absence of labour anticipatory lung fluid clearance will not have occurred. In the study done by Alok kumar and Bhat B V (7), Transient tachypnea of newborn (TTN) was found to be the commonest (42.7%) cause of RD followed by infection (17.0%), meconium aspiration syndrome (10.7%), hyaline membrane disease (9.3%) and birth asphyxia (3.3%). In our study among 16 neonates who were ventilated 5 expired, i.e., 68% survived and among 3 neonates who were given surfactant all survived. In a study done by Kulkarni M L et al., (8) 51% survived among ventilated babies. In the overall study 92.2% survived with 6 deaths. 4 deaths were due to preterm with RDS, 1 due to preterm with BA with RDS and 1 due to BA with RDS and sepsis. Most of the deaths were due to RDS (83%). According to Malhotra A K (9) 88% mortality was due to HMD and all cases of TTNB and MAS were survived and 66% of mortality was accounted due to BA and 50% mortality accounted to sepsis and pneumonia. In our study all the deaths were in below 2.5kg babies. According to Malhotra AK (9) most number of deaths were below 2.5 kgs., Respiratory distress accounts for 13.7% of all NICU admissions. Preterm babies were more in no. with male predominance; most of them were delivered vaginally. Antenatal risk factors increase the incidence of RD. Transienttachypnoea was the main cause of respiratory distress followed by RDS. In most of the cases x ray findings correlated with the clinical picture. ABG was found normal in most of the cases. RDS was the main cause for ventilation. The survival rate was 92.2% among RD cases admitted to NICU. The common cause of death was preterm and RDS.
 
 
Conclusion

Respiratory distress accounts for 13.7% of all NICU admissions Preterm babies were more in no. with male predominance; most of them were delivered vaginally.Antenatal risk factors increase the incidence of RD. Transient tachypnoea was the main cause of respiratory distress followed by RDS. In most of the cases x ray findings correlated with the clinical picture. ABG was found normal in most of the cases. RDS was the main cause for ventilation. The survival rate was 92.2% among RD cases admitted to NICU. The common cause of death was preterm and RDS.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Schaffer AJ: Disease of the new born, 3rd Ed.W.B. Saunders & co. Philadelphia.1971, p. 562.
2.
Cunningham MD: Smith FR:Stabilisation and transport of severely ill infants. Ped Clinic. North. Am 20:359, 1973.3.
3.
Prod’ham LS et al: Care of seriously ill neonates with hyaline membrane disease and with sepsis. Pediatrics. 1974,53;170-74.
4.
Thomas S et al:SPECTRUM of RDS in new born in north India :A prospective study.Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 1981, 48;pp:61-65.
5.
Khatua SP, Gangwal A, Basu P, Palodhi PKR: The incidence and etiology of respiratory distress in new born. Indian Pediatr. 16:1121 1979.
6.
Tudehope DI, Smith MH: Is transient tachypnoea of the new born always a benign condition. Ausralian Pediatric Juornal. 1979,15;p.
7.
Alok Kumar, Vishnu Bhat Epidemiology of respiratory distress of newborns. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. January-February 1996, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 93-98.
8.
Kulkarni ML et al: Neonatal mechanical ventilation. Indian Journal of paediatrics. 2003, 70;pp:539.p:160-65.
9.
Malhotra A.K. et al: Respiratory distress in new born: Treated with ventilation in a level II nursery. Indian Pediatrics. 1995, 32;pp: 207-11.
10.
Phlip et al., Early diagnosiss of neonatal sepsis, 1980,65:5:pp 1036-41.  [Google Scholar]
 
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  | 
IJNMR Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
© 2023 INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATAL MEDICINE & RESEARCH (IJNMR), ISSN : 2277-8527.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 3rd Floor, Hemraj Jain Building, 4352 Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi, India 110006,Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *