Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Neonatal Database
Neonatal Database Download
Neonatal Journal Abstracts
Feedback
Salient Features
Open Access
Editorial Board
Publisher
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Journal Policy
Peer Review Process
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
IJNMR Performance
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here
Register For Article Submission
Login Here
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJARS
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year :2025 Month : April Volume : 13 Issue : 2 Page : PO01 - PO05 Full Version

Pathological and Genetic Analysis of Foetuses with Ultrasonogram Detected Congenital Anomalies: A Cross-sectional Study from Southern India


S Ramya Devi, Tanya Salim, Uma Thankam
1. Consultant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Annai Velankanni Fertility Centre, Velankanni, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Additional Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. 3. Additional Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Tanya Salim,
Shadi Manzil, Attinkuzhi, Kazhakuttom, Trivandrum-695582, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drtanyasharmad@gmail.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Introduction: Prenatal Ultrasonogram (USG) detects the majority of congenital anomalies, but a few cases may be missed due to multiple reasons. Hence, a detailed post-mortem evaluation of foetuses following termination of pregnancy can help to arrive at a final diagnosis and aid in counselling couples about future pregnancies.

Aim: To compare prenatal ultrasound findings with autopsy findings and karyotyping in medically terminated foetuses between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (OBG), Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India, from February 2018 to January 2019. Pregnant women who underwent Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) for ultrasound-detected congenital anomalies between 12 and 20 weeks were included in the study. A detailed foetal autopsy was done and karyotyping of the foetuses was carried out. Prenatal ultrasound findings were compared with the ultrasound reports. Descriptive statistics were used and results were expressed in terms of frequency and percentages.

Results: The mean maternal age of the study participants was 26.32±4.9 years. Among the 50 foetuses examined, majority had Central Nervous System (CNS) anomalies, with 34 cases (46.5%). Foetal autopsy confirmed the ultrasound findings in all cases except one, resulting in 49 confirmed cases. Autopsy had full agreement with prenatal ultrasonogram in 28 cases (56%). Major additional autopsy findings were noted in 10 cases (20%), minor additional findings in 7 cases (14%) and both minor and major additional findings in 4 cases (8%). Major congenital anomalies are those that have medical, surgical, or cosmetic significance, like neural tube defects or orofacial clefting.

Conclusion: Foetal autopsy plays a major role in providing additional information for counselling couples and the management of future pregnancies.
Keywords : Foetal autopsy, Karyotyping, Prenatal ultrasound
DOI and Others : DOI: 10.7860/IJNMR/2025/69071.2440

Date of Submission: Dec 13, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jan 31, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Feb 24, 2025
Date of Publishing: Jun 30, 2025

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 17, 2025
• iThenticate Software: Feb 22, 2025 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7
 
INTRODUCTION

Foetal structural anomalies occur in 3-5% of all pregnancies (1). Progress in imaging technology has improved the antenatal detection rates of these anomalies. While 18-20 week scan remains the standard of care in most countries, first-trimester ultrasound, along with biochemical markers, has gained much importance in recent years (2).

Routine prenatal ultrasound has been the most important tool for assessing foetal anatomy since 1985 (3). It provides the options of termination of pregnancy owing to serious foetal malformations, depending on personal choice as well as ethical and legal considerations. Although advancement in imaging techniques have improved the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound, some abnormalities may still be missed. This may be due to factors such as oligohydramnios, maternal obesity, or foetal position. The risk of false positive diagnosis is a major concern (4).

Post-mortem examination of aborted foetuses is an important tool for assessing the quality and accuracy of obstetric sonologists. It is also useful in counselling parents regarding future pregnancies. Numerous studies have compared prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings, but they vary in inclusion criteria (5),(6),(7) and in their definition of major and minor structural anomalies.

Extensive research over the last 15 years has established that the measurement of Nuchal Translucency (NT) provides effective and early screening for chromosome defects. Increased NT is also associated with cardiac defects and other foetal structural malformations (6). The risk of chromosomal abnormalities increases with both maternal age and NT thickness and in pregnancies with low foetal NT, the maternal age-related risk decreases (6),(7),(8). According to Malone FD et al., first trimester combined screening at 11 weeks is better than second trimester quadruple screening (8). A study has evaluated the efficacy of USG examination in detecting foetal anomalies and genetic defects during the first trimester and early second trimester (9).

Foetal karyotyping: Cytogenetic analysis provides additional information, especially with recent advances in the diagnosis of genetic diseases. After the termination of pregnancy of a living foetus, the foetal cord, skin and placenta are reliable sources of foetal cells (10). In case of foetal demise, placental tissue is obtained to determine the karyotype. The primary goal of routine obstetric sonography at 18-20 weeks is to detect foetal anomalies and provide an option for legal termination of pregnancy. Foetal autopsy and karyotyping are important tools that help us to assess the quality and accuracy of prenatal ultrasonogram. With this background, the present study was conducted with aim to compare the prenatal ultrasound findings with autopsy findings in the medically terminated foetuses between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation.
 
 
Material and Methods

The present was a hospital-based cross-sectional study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, from February 2018 to January 2019. The present study was conducted only after obtaining the clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee (HEC No. 01/35/2018 MCT). Informed consent was obtained from all the participants. A total of 50 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this study.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: Antenatal women with USG detected congenital anomalies attending antenatal Outpatient Department (OPD) and undergoing medical termination between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation were included. Patients who did not consent to undertake the study were excluded. Soft markers of aneuploidy, like choroid plexus cyst, increased nasal bone thickness and foetal pyelectasis, were not included.

Study Procedure

Methods of data collection study tools: Antenatal records of mothers, including ultrasonogram were reviewed. First-trimester aneuploidy screening was done by a combined risk assessment using NT, maternal age, Pregnancy-associated Plasma Protein-A (PAPP-A) and beta human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG). Risk was calculated using software-based risk models. Low risk is those with risk below the cut-off threshold (e.g., 1:1000 for trisomy 21), while high-risk were those with risk above cut-off threshold (1:150 for trisomy 21).

Variables studied included maternal age, socioeconomic status, residence, parity, peri-conceptional folic acid intake, maternal co-morbidities, first-trimester nuchal translucency, aneuploidy screening, prenatal ultrasonogram with autopsy findings and karyotyping.

After obtaining informed consent from the parents, all foetuses underwent a standard foetal autopsy that including photography, whole body X-ray, gross examination, dissection and light microscopic examination of organ tissues at the Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Karyotyping results were obtained from the genetic clinic in the study Institute.

Outcome measurement: Agreement with autopsy findings was expressed in the following categories (11):

Category 1: Full agreement between USG and autopsy findings (100% correlation).
Category 2: Minor autopsy findings not seen or recorded at USG;
Category 3: Major autopsy findings not detected at USG;
Category 4: Minor and major additional autopsy findings.
Category 5: USG findings not confirmed at autopsy.

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered into excel sheet. Results were expressed in terms of frequency and percentage.
 
 
Results

Congenital anomalies were more common in the maternal age group of 21-25 years, accounting for 24 cases (48%) (Table/Fig 1). The mean maternal age was 26.32±4.9 years. The maximum anomalies were noticed in the paternal age group of 26-30 years, with a mean paternal age of 32.32±4.4 years.

Socioeconomic status was determined according to World Health Organisation (WHO)-modified Kuppuswamy’s classification. About 18 participants (36%) belonged to the upper lower class and 17 participants (34%) belonged to the lower middle class (Table/Fig 2). A total of 32 participants (64%) were from rural areas. A total of 42 (84%) were of non consanguineous marriage. Only eight participants gave H/o consanguineous marriage (16%).

In the present study, 32 cases (64%) were primigravidas, 7 (14%) were second gravida with one normal delivery, 7 (14%) were second gravida with one abortion, 3 (6%) were third gravida and one candidate had H/o recurrent pregnancy loss.

Paternal smoking history was elicited in 31 participants (62%). Among the participants, 36 had no family history of congenital anomaly, while 5 had a previous child with a congenital anomaly (10%).

There was a history of congenital anomalies in first-degree relatives in nine participants. A total of 37 cases (74%) were conceived spontaneously, 9 (18%) by ovulation induction and 4 (8%) via In-vitro Fertilisation (IVF). A total of 37 of the women did not take periconceptional folic acid (74%).

Considering maternal co-morbidity, 27 participants had no associated co-morbidities (54%), eight had H/o diabetes mellitus, six had epilepsy, three had thyroid disorder and two each had heart diseases, hypertension and autoimmune disease.

Regarding exposure to infections and drugs in first trimester, 31 (62%) had no exposure. Eight had H/o infections and 11 had H/o drug intake in the first trimester. Considering first-trimester exposure to drugs and infection, 8 (16%) had acute febrile illness: five cases of varicella, two cases of TORCH (Toxoplasmosis, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex and one case of influenza-like illness. Among five varicella cases, three had neural tube defects, one had non immune hydrops and one had holoprosencephaly. Of the two TORCH-positive cases, one had cystic hygroma and the other had acrania.

In the 50 samples studied, first trimester nuchal translucency measurements were >2.5 mm in 42% and <2.5 mm in 58% (Table/Fig 3). First trimester nuchal translucency. First trimester Aneuploidy screening using NT and biochemical markers was not done in 28 participants (56%). Among those who had done screening, 10 were classified as low-risk and 12 as high-risks (24%) (Table/Fig 4).

Of the foetuses, 20 were male and 19 were female. On gross examination, sex was not identified in 11 foetuses. examination. In the present study, 56% of cases had prenatal USG correlating with foetal autopsy, with additional autopsy findings in 42%. Major additional findings were seen in 20%, minor additional findings in 14% and both minor and major additional autopsy findings in 8%. 2% of prenatal USG findings did not correlate with autopsy findings; one case of cerebellar vermis agenesis present in ultrasonogram could not be found in autopsy (Table/Fig 5).

Isolated malformations accounted for 52% of cases, while multiple malformations accounted for 48% (Table/Fig 6). Central nervous system was the most common system affected accounting for 34 cases (Table/Fig 7).

In this study, all 50 foetuses underwent karyotyping, out of which aneuploidy was detected in 17 cases (34%). Trisomy 18 was the most common abnormality detected, appearing in eight samples (Table/Fig 8).
 
 
Discussion

In the present study, congenital anomalies were most commonly observed in the maternal age group of 21-25 years, with a mean age of 26.32 years. According to a study by Hollier LM et al., maternal age beyond 25 years is associated with an increased risk of congenital malformation not caused by aneuploidy (12).

The authors observed that anomalies were more frequent in primigravida accounting for 64%. The result is similar to several previous studies (13),(14),(15). Duong HT et al., found that primigravida were more likely to have infants with conditions such as amniotic band syndrome, hydrocephaly, oesophageal atresia (13).

In the present study, anomalies were more common in patients who conceived spontaneously (74%). However, according to literature suggests that congenital anomalies are more common among IVF-conceived patients (12),(13). Paternal smoking was noticed in 62% of cases. According to a study by Deng K et al., Congenital Heart Defects (CHD) are more common in cases involving paternal smoking (16).

Considering first trimester exposure to drugs and infection, 8 (16%) had acute febrile illness-five had varicella, two had TORCH infections and one had an influenza-like illness. Among five varicella cases, three had neural tube defects, one had non immune hydrops and one had holoprosencephaly. Of the two TORCH-positive cases, one had cystic hygroma and other acrania. According to Golatipour MJ et al., there is association between TORCH infections in first trimester and congenital anomalies (17).

A total of 11 participants had a history of drug intake, of which five had taken antiepileptics, two had taken azathioprine, one took prednisolone and another took metformin and olanzapine and three cases took valproate usage. All three cases of valproate intake were associated with neural tube defects. According to Turget U et al., high-dose valproate led to neural tube defects (18).

Perinatal USG with autopsy correlation: In the present study, autopsy confirmed the presence of USG findings in 98% (49 cases), except for one case of cerebellar vermis agenesis, which was not found in autopsy. This finding coincides with the study conducted by Sankar VH and Phadke SR (19). In their study, Foetal autopsy was able to provide a definitive final diagnosis in 59%. Autopsy failed to confirm USG findings in 2% of 206 samples. Additional findings were seen in 77 cases.

In another study by Amini H et al., Ultrasound (USG) findings were confirmed in 53.4% of cases and additional findings were noted in 37.8% (20). A retrospective study by Kaasen A et al., showed full agreement between USG and autopsy in 58.4% of cases, with additional autopsy findings in 31.4% (5). In 2010, Phadke SR and Gupta A, in a 7-year retrospective study, demonstrated complete concordance between prenatal scan and autopsy findings in 72.5% and major concordance in 23% (11).

In the present study, Nuchal Translucency (NT) and aneuploidy screening in the first trimester were also examined. A total of 42% of the participants had an NT measurement greater than 2.5 mm. According to Bahado-Singh RO et al., elevated NT in first trimester is associated with congenital heart disease (21).

Among the study participants, 24% were classified as high-risk for aneuploidy and 20% were classified as low-risk. All cases classified as low-risk had normal karyotyping. According to a study by Vogt C et al., 30% of foetuses that were terminated had abnormal karyotyping, with trisomy 18 being the most common abnormality detected (22).

A similar study by Rossi AC and Prefumo F confirmed prenatal ultrasound findings in 68% of cases, provided additional information in 22.5% and found unconfirmed prenatal ultrasound in 9.2%. Additionally, 3.2% of cases were false positive and 2.5% were false negative (23). A study on the association between selected structural defects and chromosomal abnormalities by Acavado-Gallegos S et al., showed that association of two or more structural defects increased the probability of a foetus having a positive karyotyping result. The most important association was among heart defect facial clefts and trisomy 13 (24).

Congenital anomalies remain a common cause of perinatal deaths (19). The recurrence of anomalies in subsequent pregnancy varies depending on the oetiology of diagnosis. The present study tries to bring out the importance foetal autopsy in confirming ultrasound findings and detecting additional findings. With the advent of new genetic testing tools, like whole gene sequencing and exome sequencing, the detection rate of genetic abnormalities has improved highly (25). Further studies using these techniques will go a long way in the prenatal detection of genetic diseases, This will allow the clinician and parents to make an informed decision regarding the management of the pregnancy.

Limitation(s)

The small sample size may affect the accuracy of the diagnostic yield of karyotyping.
 
 
Conclusion

Major congenital anomalies can be identified by ultrasonogram done in early trimester. foetal autopsy still plays an important role in achieving an accurate diagnosis to delineate multiple anomalies, especially in condition where sonographic visualisation is difficult, such as in cases of decreased amniotic fluid and maternal obesity. The verification of ultrasound findings is important for the couple involved, the clinician and for epidemiological analysis. Hence, validation of prenatal findings by a detailed postmortem examination should be implemented. Early detection of congenital anomalies and their timely intervention goes a long way in reducing perinatal mortality.
 
REFERENCES
1.
Garne E, Dolk H, Loane M, Boyd PA; EUROCAT. EUROCAT website data on prenatal detection rates of congenital anomalies. J Med Screen. 2010;17(2):97-98.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Degklis T, Allan L, Nicolaides KH. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(1).90-102.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Curado J, Bhide A. The use of ultrasound in the antenatal diagnosis of structutal abnormalites. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine. 2018;28(10):301-07.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
4.
Debost-Legrand A, Perthus I, Riviere O, Gallot D, Lemery D, Vendittelli F. Are there risk factors for false-positive malformation diagnosis on obstetric ultrasound? A nested case-control study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(3):107-111. Doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.12.001.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
5.
Kaasen A, Tuveng J, Heiberg A, Scoti A, Haugen G. Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: A study of second-trimester abortions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(7):925-33.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Nicolaides KH. First-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities. Semin Perinatol. 2005;29(4):190-94. Doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2005.06.001. PMID:16104667.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Sun CCJ, Grumbach K, DeCosta DT, Meyers CM, Dungan JS. Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal anomalies. Pediatr Dev Pathol.1999;2(2):131-42.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Bukowski R, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Dawn’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(19):2001-11.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Pathak S, Lees C. Ultrasound structural fetal anomaly screening: An update. Arch Dis Child-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(5):F384-90.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Clunie G, Ralston SJ, Cowan JM, Kajewski K, Craigo SD. Which tissue should be used to obtain a fetal karyotype after second trimester termination of pregnancy. AJOJ. 2004;191(6):s46.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
11.
Phadke SR, Gupta A. Comparison of prenatal ultrasound findings and autopsy findings in foetuses terminated after prenatal diagnosis of malformations. An experience of a clinical genetics center. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010:38(5):244-49.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Hollier LM, Leveno KJ, Kelly MA, M Clntire DD, Cunningham FG. Maternal age and malformation in singleton births. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5):701-06.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Duong HT, Hoyt AT, Carmichael SL, Gilboa SM, Canfield MA, Case A, et al. Maternal parity an independent risk factor for birth defects? Birth defects. Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(4):230-36.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
McNeese ML, Selwyn BJ, Duong H, Canfield M, Waller DK. The association between maternal parity and birth defects. Birt Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2015;103(2):144-56.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Csermely G, Susanszky E, Czeizel AE, Veszprcini B. Possible association of first and high birth order of pregnant women with the risk of isolated congenital abnormalities in Hungary – a population – based case matched control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:181-86.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Deng K, Liu Z, Lin Y, Mu D, Chen X, Li J, et al. Periconceptional paternal smoking and te risk of congenital heart defects: A case-control study. Birt Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(4) 210-16.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Golatipour MJ, Khodbakshi B, Ghaemi E. Possible role of TORCH agents in congenital malformations in Gorgan, northern Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15:330-36.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]
18.
Turget U, Kazan S, Cakin H, Ozak A. Valproic acid effect on neural tube defects is not prevented by concomitant folic acid supplementation: Early chick embryo model pilot study. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2019;78:45-48.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Sankar VH, Phadke SR. Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings. J Perinatol. 2006;26(4):224-29.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
20.
Amini H, Antorisson P, Papadogiaonakis N, Ericson K, Pilo C, Eriksson L, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and autopsy findings in pregnancies terminated due to fetal anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(10):1208-16.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Bahado-Singh RO, Wapner R, Thorn E, Zchary J, Platt L, Maboney MJ, et al. Elevated first-trimester nuchal translucency increases the risk of congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1357-61.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
22.
Vogt C, Blaas HG, Salvesen KÅ, Eik-Nes SH. Comparison between prenatal ultrasound and post-mortem findings in foetuses and infants with developmental anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(6):666-72.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
23.
Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Correlation between fetal autopsy and prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:201-06.   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
24.
Acevedo-Gallegos S, García M, Benavides-Serralde A, Camargo-Marín L, Aguinaga-Ríos M, Ramírez-Calvo J, et al. Association between selected structural defects and chromosomal abnormalities. Rev Invest Clin. 2013;65(3):248-54. PMID: 23877812.   [Google Scholar]
25.
Westernius E, Conner P, Peterson M, Sahlin E, Papadogiannakis N, Lindstrand A, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in prenataly detected congenital malformations: Prospective cohort study in clinical setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;63(5):658-63.  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2] [Table/Fig-3] [Table/Fig-4] [Table/Fig-5]
[Table/Fig-6] [Table/Fig-7] [Table/Fig-8]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  | 
IJNMR Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
© 2023 INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATAL MEDICINE & RESEARCH (IJNMR), ISSN : 2277-8527.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 3rd Floor, Hemraj Jain Building, 4352 Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi, India 110006,Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *