
           <rss version="2.0">
                <channel>
                    <title>Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine & Research</title>
                     <link>https://www.ijnmr.net/back_issues.aspx</link>
                    <description>
                    IJNMR
                    </description>
        
            <item>
                <title>Current Insights into Newborn Hearing Screening: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India</title>
               <author>Prakash Chandra Joshi, Bindiya Verma, Niranjan Kumar Singh, Sachin Verma</author>
               <description>&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Hearing impairment is one of the most common congenital disorders and can significantly affect speech, language, and cognitive development if not identified early. Universal newborn hearing screening plays a vital role in early diagnosis and intervention. However, data on neonatal hearing loss from developing countries, including India, remain limited.

&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; To determine the prevalence of screen positive hearing impairment among neonates attending a tertiary care hospital using Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators.

&lt;b&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/b&gt; This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India from September 2023 to August 2025. A total of 404 neonates were screened using a two-stage AABR protocol. Neonates who failed or had an aborted first-stage AABR underwent second-stage AABR screening. Those who failed the second stage were referred for diagnostic Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) at three months of age. Chi-square test was used to determine the association between different factors and outcomes.

&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Of the 404 neonates screened, AABR testing was aborted in 2 (0.5%), 62 (15.35%) failed, and 340 (84.15%) passed the first-stage screening. Of the 64 neonates who failed or had aborted tests, 37 underwent second-stage screening. Only 3 (8.11%) passed the second- stage AABR, while 34 (91.89%) failed. Overall, hearing impairment was detected in 34 neonates by two-stage screening, giving a prevalence of 8.42%, while the prevalence of confirmed hearing impairment was 0.74% (3/404). The association between neonatal morbidity and hearing abnormalities was highly significant (p-value &lt;0.001).

&lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; The prevalence of screen positive hearing impairment observed in this study (8.42%) was higher than that reported in Western literature but comparable to that in recent Indian studies. Poor follow-up compliance remains a major challenge in implementing universal newborn hearing screening programs. Strengthening follow-up mechanisms and ensuring early intervention for screen-positive neonates are essential to reduce the burden of childhood hearing loss.</description>
             
         
       
          <link> https://ijnmr.net/article_fulltext.aspx?issn=0973-709x&amp;year=2026&amp;month=April&amp;volume=14&amp;issue=2&amp;page=PO01-PO05&amp;id=2473</link>
          <doi> https://doi.org/10.7860/IJNMR/2026/87327.2473</doi>
        </item>
        
                </channel>
            </rss>  
        


