Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Neonatal Database
Neonatal Database Download
Neonatal Journal Abstracts
Feedback
Aims and Scope
Salient Features
Open Access
Editorial Board
Publisher
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Peer Review Process
Contact Us
Current Issue
Online Ahead of Print
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here
Register For Article Submission
Login Here
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJARS
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article / research

Year : 2019 Month : July-September Volume : 7 Issue : 3 Page : PO14 - PO19

Comparing the Effect of Room Air versus Commercially Available Oxygen for the Resuscitation of Asphyxiated Neonates in Kabul City: A Randomised Clinical Trial

 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Mansoor Aslamzai,
Department of Neonatology, Maiwand Teaching Hospital, 1st district, Kabul, Afghanistan.
E-mail: mansooraslamzai@gmail.com
Introduction: Perinatal asphyxia is one of the leading causes of neonatal death in Afghanistan. Recent recommendation has accepted room air as preferred therapy in the resuscitation of asphyxiated term neonates. Since the quality of air is poor in Kabul city so a study was needed to assess its efficacy in the resuscitation of neonates.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of room air versus commercially available oxygen for the resuscitation of asphyxiated term and preterm neonates.

Materials and Methods: This study was a randomised clinical trial conducted at Neonatology ward of Malalai Hospital in Kabul city, Afghanistan. Total 300 neonates of 30-41 weeks gestation diagnosed as severe perinatal asphyxia were randomly resuscitated with either room air or commercially available oxygen. The clinical parameters were the Apgar score, oxygen saturation and neonatal mortality percentage. Statically analysis was performed by SPSS 20.

Results: One hundred and fifty neonates in the room air group and 150 neonates in commercially available oxygen group were investigated. The term neonate percentage was 76% and 75.3% in the room air and oxygen group respectively. Term neonates resuscitated with room air had obtained higher mean oxygen saturation (83.4±14.9, p=0.001) than oxygen (77.1±13.1, p=0.001) at 5 minute of birth. Median Apgar score was the same in both groups (5, p=0.001). The difference of mortality during hospital stay in both groups was not statistically significant (5.26% vs 7%, p=0.59). Mean oxygen saturation in preterm newborn babies were 80.58±15.62 and 78.41±11.91 with p=0.22, respectively in both groups. Median Apgar score in room air was 6 and in oxygen group was 5 with p=0.33. Preterm infant also showed non-significant difference of mortality during hospital stay in both groups (11.1% vs 18.9%, p=0.5).

Conclusion: Despite poor air quality in Kabul city, room air was significantly more effective than commercially available oxygen to increase oxygen saturation and as effective as commercially available oxygen to elevate Apgar scores in the resuscitation of asphyxiated term neonates. The difference in the mortality was not statistically significant in both the groups. The efficacy of room air did not appear statistically significant for the resuscitation of preterm neonates.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments (0)
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  | 
IJNMR Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
© 2025 INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATAL MEDICINE & RESEARCH (IJNMR), ISSN : 2277-8527.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 3rd Floor, Hemraj Jain Building, 4352 Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi, India 110006,Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *